The word “precursor” is indispensable to the vocabulary of criticism, but one must try to purify it from any connotation of polemic or rivalry. The fact is that each writer creates his precursors. His work modifies our conception of the past, as it will modify the future. —Borges
successor to Thinkige Kru whose feed doesn't seem to be working properly for reasons unknown - the old blog + archive remains here https://thinkigekru.blogspot.com/ -^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^vintage thoughts from others, vintage thoughts from me - varying degrees of profundity - thoughts quoted for the turn of thought / phrase rather than for truth value - quoted not necessarily because i agree with them or approve of them - i don't necessarily agree with my own past thinkiges!
Thursday, November 2, 2023
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Always a little amazed when people seem to suggest that Jim Morrison was unaware of his own ridiculousness. I think he reveled in it, plun...
-
Read this a while ago in a story about the recent spate of orcas, a.k.a. killer whales, attacking and damaging boats: "... S cientist...
-
“The terms of approbation applied to Beyoncé could not be more rockist. Deep, meaningful, political, Zeitgeist-y, content-heavy, Arty, etc e...
Love this. He was good, that Borges, wasn't he?
ReplyDeleteThere is one of the 70s campus novels, a Bradbury or a Lodge, where a character's field of research is T.S. Eliot's influence on Shakespeare. Every time he explains to someone what he does, they try to correct him: "You mean Shakespeare's influence on Eliot." And he patiently has to explain that, no, he meant exactly what he said.
It's played for laughs, but it is really a perfectly serious idea. Borges knew.